| Technique | Example in Op. 90 No. 2 | |-----------|--------------------------| | | E-flat major → E major (B section) | | Enharmonic Reinterpretation | C-flat major chord (bar 61) heard as B major (dominant of E) | | German Augmented 6th | Bar 18: A-flat – C – E-flat – F# resolves to G (V of F minor) | | Common-Tone Diminished 7th | Bar 36: C°⁷ (C – Eb – Gb – A) resolves to E-flat major chord | | Neapolitan as Structural Pivot | F-flat major in coda (enharmonic to E major from Trio) | | Deceptive Cadence (V – bVI) | B-flat⁷ (V of E-flat) to C-flat major (bar 61) |
Before diving into the harmonic analysis, let's set the stage with some background information. Schubert composed his Op. 90 impromptus in 1827, during a particularly productive period in his life. These pieces were intended for solo piano, and their title, "Impromptu," was chosen by the publisher, rather than Schubert himself. The impromptus are characterized by their poetic, expressive nature and technical challenges, making them a staple of the piano repertoire. schubert impromptu op 90 no 2 harmonic analysis