| Publisher: | MOBOTIX AG |
|---|---|
| Author: | Bernd Wilhelm Thilo Schüller |
| Date: | 2025-12-16 |
| Document: | release-notes_V5.4.10.4_en_v1.1.html |
| Confidentiality: | public |
These Release Notes contain a technical description of the most important changes in the software for the MOBOTIX network cameras.
| Release Version | Creation Date | Publishing Date |
|---|---|---|
| MX-V5.4.10.4 | 2025-11-10 | 2025-12-16 |
| MX-V5.4.9.9-r1 | 2024-10-22 | 2024-10-24 |
| MX-V5.4.9.4-r3 | 2024-06-14 | 2024-06-17 |
| MX-V5.4.9.4-r1 | 2023-10-04 | 2023-10-16 |
| MX-V5.4.9.4 (replaced by MX-V5.4.9-r1) |
2023-06-01 | 2023-06-16 |
| MX-V5.4.8.4-r2 | 2023-02-24 | 2023-03-03 |
| MX-V5.4.8.4 | 2022-12-01 | 2022-12-07 |
| MX-V5.4.7.12 | 2022-08-26 | 2022-09-02 |
| MX-V5.4.6.7 | 2022-01-27 | 2022-02-15 |
| MX-V5.4.6.6 (replaced by MX-V5.4.6.7) |
2022-01-07 | 2022-01-27 |
| MX-V5.4.6.3 | 2021-09-21 | 2021-09-28 |
| MX-V5.4.0.55 | 2021-04-21 | 2021-06-02 |
| MX-V5.4.0.49 | 2020-12-11 | 2020-12-16 |
| MX-V5.4.0.45 | 2020-11-09 | 2020-11-12 |
| MX-V5.4.0.44 | 2020-09-17 | 2020-09-18 |
| MX-V5.2.6.7 | 2020-06-16 | 2020-06-24 |
| MX-V5.2.6.4 | 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-20 |
| MX-V5.2.6.2 | 2020-04-23 | 2020-05-05 |
| MX-V5.2.5.15-r1 | 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-12 |
| MX-V5.2.5.15 (replaced by MX-V5.2.5.15-r1) |
2020-01-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| MX-V5.2.4.15-r2 | 2019-09-25 | 2019-10-01 |
| MX-V5.2.4.15 |
2019-07-26 | 2019-07-31 |
| MX-V5.2.3.30 | 2019-04-11 | 2019-04-15 |
| MX-V5.2.1.4 | 2018-12-20 | 2018-12-20 |
| MX-V5.2.0.61 | 2018-10-30 | 2018-11-02 |
| MX-V5.1.0.99-r4 | 2018-10-24 | 2018-11-06 |
| MX-V5.1.0.99-r3 (replaced by MX-V5.1.0.99-r4) |
2018-07-11 | 2018-07-13 |
| MX-V5.1.0.99 (replaced by MX-V5.1.0.99-r3) |
2018-06-15 | 2018-06-15 |
| MX-V5.0.2.14 | 2018-02-07 | 2018-02-14 |
| MX-V5.0.1.53 | 2017-10-26 | 2017-11-20 |
| MX-V5.0.0.133 | 2017-07-21 | 2017-08-08 |
| MX-V5.0.0.130 | 2017-06-21 | 2017-07-14 |
| MX-V5.0.0.127 | 2017-04-27 | 2017-05-05 |
Creation Date: 2025-11-10
Publishing Date: 2025-12-16
Much of the criticism centered on her creating explicit (NSFW) audio scripts involving characters from series like My Hero Academia . Critics argued that even with "aged up" disclaimers, the content inherently sexualized underage characters.
Based on the current status of the Yagami Yato audio community, there is no longer an official or reliably public Google Doc containing her full library. Current Status of Document Links Official Google Drive Deleted : The main Google Drive
What distinguished this document from typical “call-out posts” was its format and its perceived irrefutability. A Google Doc is collaborative, static, and archivable. Unlike a tweet that can be deleted or a livestream that vanishes, the document persisted. It became a shareable, citable primary source. For fans, it transformed vague rumors into a structured repository of claims, effectively becoming a digital monument to the controversy.
The document typically focuses on several recurring themes that the community found problematic:
evenstream.jpg is abortedevenstream.jpg,
for example by the MxManagementCenter, are now better handled. In this case, a message "hh:mm:ss STREAM eventstream[nnnn] Closing stream to 10.xx.yyy.zzz. Write timeout."
is written to the system messages, which suggests an external interruption of the data stream due to network disturbances or a failure of the eventstream client
as the cause of the problem.
The software contains the
same known limitations as the version MX-V5-4-9-9-r1.
Much of the criticism centered on her creating explicit (NSFW) audio scripts involving characters from series like My Hero Academia . Critics argued that even with "aged up" disclaimers, the content inherently sexualized underage characters.
Based on the current status of the Yagami Yato audio community, there is no longer an official or reliably public Google Doc containing her full library. Current Status of Document Links Official Google Drive Deleted : The main Google Drive
What distinguished this document from typical “call-out posts” was its format and its perceived irrefutability. A Google Doc is collaborative, static, and archivable. Unlike a tweet that can be deleted or a livestream that vanishes, the document persisted. It became a shareable, citable primary source. For fans, it transformed vague rumors into a structured repository of claims, effectively becoming a digital monument to the controversy.
The document typically focuses on several recurring themes that the community found problematic: